Cash for Clunkers – or CARS, the Car Allowance Rebate System – was, on its face, a good idea. It was meant to revitalize the auto industry, get people into newer, safer, and more fuel efficient vehicles, and get many of those exhaust belching clunkers off the road. Naturally, the program was hailed as a success by DC despite being a failure and an administrative and financial fiasco.
The program was expensive, costing three billion dollars. In the midst of an economic downturn, the government didn’t just have that kind of money on hand. They had to borrow it, increasing the nation’s debt. Individuals taking part in the program were likely giving up a paid-for car and getting a car that will take years to pay off. So, not only did CARS increase the national debt, but also the individual debt of many participants.
The program failed to stimulate the auto industry. Instead of increasing car sales, it simply concentrated sales that would have taken place later to the short time that the program lasted. This created a void in auto sales later in the year. Also, many Americans used the rebate to purchase Japanese and Korean cars, further decreasing any potential gain for American auto makers.
CARS took in over 100,000 used cars and scrapped them. This decreased the used car inventory in the country. Simple economics: decreased supply equals higher prices. People shopping for a used car post-CARS are forced to pay more for a vehicle that would have cost less pre-CARS.
Many auto dealers received no government reimbursement or were wildly under-reimbursed for the rebates they had to front to program participants. And in some cases, dealers simply gave up on seeking reimbursement due to the complex and difficult nature of the reimbursement process.
CARS just created more debt and didn’t stimulate the auto industry. It was an expensive waste of taxpayer money and an utter failure.








